Furthering Development of a Unified Emergency Scale Using Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgment: A Progress Report
نویسندگان
چکیده
In disasters, local civilians on or near the scene, are often first to respond and give aid. Therefore, the public needs to be well-informed with accurate, time critical information. However, a primary information source is eventspecific scales that are inconsistent in their categorization and measurement, adding confusion to public responsiveness. These scales are not extendable to new emergencies in a changing world. We argue for development of a unified emergency scale to facilitate communication and understanding. This scale will inform local communities with regional community-specific information, and will be extendable for further use by professional responders. Research in progress elicited 15 dimensions of an emergency using a Delphi-like process and then ranked the dimensions by importance utilizing Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgment. Contributions of this paper are to highlight the need for an unequivocal, unified scale and further its development.
منابع مشابه
A Dynamic Delphi Process Utilizing a Modified Thurstone Scaling Method: Collaborative Judgement in Emergency Response
In an extreme event or major disaster, very often there are both alternative actions that might be considered and far more requests for actions than can be executed immediately. The relative desirability of each option for action could be a collaborative expression of a significant number of emergency managers and experts trying to manage the most desirable alternatives at any given time, in re...
متن کاملScaling of Ratings: Concepts and Methods
Rating scales provide an efficient and widely used means of recording judgments. This paper reviews scaling issues within the context of a psychometric model of the rating process and describes several methods of scaling rating data. The scaling procedures include the simple mean, standardized values, scale values based on Thurstone’s Law of Categorical Judgment, and regression-based values. Th...
متن کاملHow to Analyze Paired Comparison Data
Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgment provides a method to convert subjective paired comparisons into one-dimensional quality scores. Applications include judging quality of different image reconstructions, or different products, or different web search results, etc. This tutorial covers the popular Thurstone-Mosteller Case V model and the Bradley-Terry logistic variant. We describe three app...
متن کاملComparative Analysis of Bradley-Terry and Thurstone-Mosteller Paired Comparison Models for Image Quality Assessment
In image quality assessment, preference for various image processing algorithms or treatments is often determined using paired comparisons. In this experimental design, pairs of images processed by different algorithms or “treatments” are presented to a judge. The preferred treatment is selected and a tally is kept of the number of times each treatment is preferred to another. It is possible to...
متن کاملError estimation of paired comparison tests for Thurstone's Case V
Pair comparison methods based on Case V of Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgment are widely used to derive interval scales for perceptual image quality. A thorough treatment of the involved statistical errors is often neglected, even though this is the base for computing confidence intervals and other statistical tests. In this paper we show, that consequent error estimation through all steps...
متن کامل